NSEC E-Consultation Process and Planning - Revision history

Jjh at 15:27, 21 September 2007

2007-09-21T15:27:18Z

Jjh: /* Planning Outcomes */

2007-04-27T11:24:49Z

‎Planning Outcomes

Jjh: /* Planning Process */

2007-04-27T11:19:34Z

‎Planning Process

Jjh: /* Planning Process */

2007-04-27T11:18:33Z

‎Planning Process

Jjh: /* Planning Process */

2007-04-27T11:18:21Z

‎Planning Process

Jjh: /* Planning Process */

2007-04-27T11:15:48Z

‎Planning Process

Jjh: /* Key Issues */

2007-04-27T11:15:22Z

‎Key Issues

Jjh: /* Key Issues */

2007-04-27T11:14:52Z

‎Key Issues

Jjh: /* Underpinning different levels of Engagement */

2007-04-27T11:14:19Z

‎Underpinning different levels of Engagement

Jjh: /* Underpinning different levels of Engagement */

2007-04-27T11:13:52Z

‎Underpinning different levels of Engagement

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-This page outlines how NSEC began to plan the implementation of their [[NSEC E-Consultation Context#Developing and maintaining lines of communication|North-South Exchange programme]].
+This page outlines how [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] began to plan the implementation of their [[NSEC E-Consultation Context#Developing and maintaining lines of communication|North-South Exchange programme]].
 ==Objective: A framework to manage the consultation complexity==
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 In the series of meetings with [http://www.nsec.info NSEC], two key points worth noting arose:
 # ''The need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims''. While the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] brief was to consult widely, it was difficult to ensure that the aims of each individual consultation process were clarified.
-# ''The need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies''. The [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] management team had to attend several public fora and technology demonstrations before either party committed to a joint trial.
+# ''The need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies''. The [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] management team had to attend several public forums and technology demonstrations before either party committed to a joint trial.
 ==Planning==
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 #Technologies are demonstrated
 #[[Technology refinement cycle]]
-#Interim trial findings prodocuded.  A 7 point revised e-consultation strategy is developed
+#Interim trial findings produced.  A 7 point revised e-consultation strategy is developed
 #E-consultation trial is revised

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 #To evaluate exchange programmes and to devise ways of optimising the benefits gained from these activities not only for the actual participants but also for the schools that were involved.
 #To gather input from stakeholders (3,000 local groups and 18 management bodies) for policy development.
-#To capture the attitudes and expectations of young people, teachers and youth workers. (This process had already started with the publication of the quality research study entitled “In their own words” by [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] and it was hoped to make this type of activity ongoing).
+#To capture the attitudes and expectations of young people, teachers and youth workers. (This process had already started with the publication of the quality research study entitled [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm “In their own words”] by [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] and it was hoped to make this type of activity ongoing).
 #To identify best practice.

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 # [[Trialist]] attend technology demonstration
 # Research team have formal meeting with NSEC. This led to initial definition of a problem
-# The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC.  Technologies and Processes are discussed.
+# The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC.  Technologies and processes are discussed.
 # NSEC outline clear consultation objectives:
-##The Single framework programme
+##The Single Framework Programme (SFP)
 ##An evaluation framework
-##Policy development and input from stakeholders' qualitative findings
+##Policy development and input from stakeholders' (qualitative) findings
 ##The identification of best practice
 #Technologies are chosen: E-newsletter; online surveys; discussion forum; and, mailing list
-#Demonstration of the technologies.
+#Technologies are demonstrated
-#Technology refinement cycle
+#[[Technology refinement cycle]]
 #Interim trial findings prodocuded.  A 7 point revised e-consultation strategy is developed
 #E-consultation trial is revised

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 The overall planning process can be viewed as a flow chart (thumbnail right).  The planning and e-consultation development process steps are also summarised below:[[Image:NSEC_Planning_Process.png|right|thumb|Planning and Development Process Flow Chart]]
 # Participants are selected
-# [[Trialist]] attend Technology Demonstration
+# [[Trialist]] attend technology demonstration
 # Research team have formal meeting with NSEC. This led to initial definition of a problem
 # The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC.  Technologies and Processes are discussed.

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 The overall planning process can be viewed as a flow chart (thumbnail right).  The planning and e-consultation development process steps are also summarised below:[[Image:NSEC_Planning_Process.png|right|thumb|Planning and Development Process Flow Chart]]
 # Participants are selected
-# Trialist attend Technology Demonstration
+# [[Trialist]] attend Technology Demonstration
 # Research team have formal meeting with NSEC. This led to initial definition of a problem
 # The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC.  Technologies and Processes are discussed.

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ==Key Issues==
 In the series of meetings with [http://www.nsec.info NSEC], two key points worth noting arose:
-# The need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims. While the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] brief was to consult widely, it was difficult to ensure that the aims of each individual consultation process was clarified.
+# The need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims. While the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] brief was to consult widely, it was difficult to ensure that the aims of each individual consultation process were clarified.
 # The need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies. The [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] management team had to attend several public fora and technology demonstrations before either party committed to a joint trial.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Rather than set out to achieve a single consultation exercise, the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] remit was to develop an e-consultation framework that was capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders.
-On one hand, there was the policy arena, which concerned such issues as future development of [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm North South exchange programmes], and on the other, there was an ongoing need to evaluate existing exchange programmes in order to provide feedback to programme designers.
+On one hand, there was the '''policy arena''', which concerned such issues as future development of [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm North South exchange programmes], and on the other, there was an '''ongoing need to evaluate existing exchange programmes''' in order to provide feedback to programme designers.
 The stakeholders most likely to be targeted in the trials were identified as:

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ====Underpinning different levels of Engagement====
-Rather than set out to achieve a single consultation exercise, the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] remit was to develop an e-consultation framework that was capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders. On one hand, there was the policy arena, which concerned such issues as future development of [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm North South exchange programmes], and on the other, there was an ongoing need to evaluate existing exchange programmes in order to provide feedback to programme designers.
+Rather than set out to achieve a single consultation exercise, the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] remit was to develop an e-consultation framework that was capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders.
 The stakeholders most likely to be targeted in the trials were identified as: